// Device catalog

Vagus stimulation devices on the market

Every major implantable, transcutaneous, and consumer-wellness device that targets the vagus nerve — what it does, what it's approved for, and what the evidence actually supports.

Implantable VNS

VNS Therapy System (SenTiva / AspireSR / Symmetry)

LivaNova (formerly Cyberonics)
FDA-approved
Indications
  • Drug-resistant focal epilepsy (≥4 yrs, adjunctive) — approved 1997
  • Treatment-resistant depression (adjunctive) — approved 2005
  • AspireSR/SenTiva: closed-loop ictal-tachycardia detection (AutoStim)
Mechanism

Helical platinum-iridium electrodes around left cervical vagus, IPG implanted infraclavicularly. Delivers chronic intermittent stimulation; some models trigger extra bursts on heart-rate rise (seizure proxy).

Parameters

Typical: 0.25–2.0 mA, 20–30 Hz, 250–500 µs, 30 s ON / 5 min OFF. Titrated over weeks.

Evidence

Epilepsy: ~50% of patients achieve ≥50% seizure reduction at 2 yrs (open-label cohorts). TRD: RECOVER trial (2024) showed modest but durable response/remission gains over sham at 12 months in adjunctive use.

Caveats

Surgical risks (vocal-cord paresis, infection). Voice alteration, cough, dyspnea during ON-cycle very common. Not curative. MRI compatibility model-dependent.

Implantable VNS

SetPoint System

SetPoint Medical
Investigational
Indications
  • Moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RESET-RA pivotal trial)
  • Multiple sclerosis (exploratory)
Mechanism

Miniaturized leadless cervical VNS implant; brief once-daily stimulation aimed at engaging the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (α7-nAChR on splenic macrophages).

Parameters

Typically 1 minute/day, low charge per day vs epilepsy devices.

Evidence

Pilot RA studies (Koopman 2016, Genovese 2020) showed ACR20 responses; RESET-RA pivotal results pending FDA review (2024–2025).

Caveats

Not yet FDA-approved as of 2025. Still surgical. Long-term immune effects under study.

Cervical (tcVNS)

gammaCore Sapphire

electroCore
FDA-cleared
Indications
  • Acute treatment of episodic cluster headache (adults)
  • Prevention of cluster headache
  • Acute and preventive treatment of migraine (adults & adolescents 12+)
  • Adjunctive use in hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania (off-label/CE)
Mechanism

Handheld device delivers proprietary 5 kHz sinusoidal burst (~24 V) over the cervical vagus through the skin for 2-min doses. Engages cervical vagal afferents; CNS effects on trigeminocervical complex proposed.

Parameters

120 s stimulations, typically 2–3 doses per attack; up to 24 doses/day for prevention.

Evidence

ACT1/ACT2 cluster trials and PRESTO/PREMIUM migraine trials show modest but real benefit vs sham. Insurance coverage is patchy.

Caveats

Skin tingling, neck discomfort. Avoid over carotid bifurcation, bypassed cardiac conduction, metallic implants in neck. Battery cards limit doses.

Auricular (taVNS)

NEMOS / tVNS L (Cerbomed → tVNS Technologies)

tVNS Technologies
CE-marked
Indications
  • Drug-resistant epilepsy (CE)
  • Depression (CE, EU)
  • Used widely in research for HRV, inflammation, cognition studies
Mechanism

Ear electrode targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (cymba conchae). Delivers biphasic pulses; stimulation perceived as gentle tingling.

Parameters

25 Hz, 250 µs, 0.1–10 mA titrated to comfort; typical research dosing 30–60 min/day.

Evidence

Mixed: small/medium RCTs show effects on HRV, mood, and pain; large pivotal trials still lacking. CADET-RA (2025) and migraine pilots ongoing.

Caveats

CE ≠ FDA. Not approved for medical use in the US. Effect sizes in research are small and heterogeneous.

Auricular (taVNS)

Parasym (formerly Nurosym)

Parasym Health
CE-marked
Indications
  • Marketed in EU/UK for HRV, stress, sleep, long-COVID symptoms (registered medical device)
  • Investigational in long-COVID, POTS, AFib trials
Mechanism

Tragus-clip taVNS, biphasic square pulse; mobile-app-controlled.

Parameters

Default 200 µs, 30 Hz, ramped intensity; sessions ~30–60 min daily.

Evidence

Several small academic trials (HRV, POTS, AF burden). Long-COVID and AFib RCTs underway. Independent replication still limited.

Caveats

Marketed direct-to-consumer with strong wellness framing; consumer claims can outpace evidence.

Auricular (taVNS)

Vagustim

Vagustim Health (Türkiye)
CE-marked
Indications
  • General wellness, HRV, stress; clinic-based protocols
Mechanism

Bilateral auricular taVNS with Bluetooth biofeedback (HRV).

Parameters

Adjustable frequency 1–100 Hz, 100–500 µs, intensity titrated.

Evidence

Mostly company-sponsored or small academic studies; growing clinic adoption in EU.

Caveats

Not FDA-cleared. Evidence base thinner than NEMOS / Parasym.

Consumer / wellness

Truvaga

electroCore
Consumer / wellness (no medical claim)
Indications
  • General wellness: stress, sleep, focus (no medical indications)
Mechanism

Same hardware family as gammaCore but marketed as a general-wellness device — direct-to-consumer, no prescription, no specific medical claim.

Parameters

2-min cervical sessions, 1–4×/day.

Evidence

Borrows mechanistic plausibility from gammaCore; no condition-specific RCT supports the consumer wellness positioning.

Caveats

Wellness label intentionally avoids FDA medical-device review for new claims. Don't infer migraine/cluster benefit from gammaCore data.

Consumer / wellness

Pulsetto

Pulsetto
Consumer / wellness (no medical claim)
Indications
  • Marketed for stress, anxiety, sleep, burnout, pain, focus
Mechanism

Neck-worn device delivering low-intensity electrical pulses claimed to stimulate the cervical vagus.

Parameters

App-selectable 'modes' (sleep, calm, etc.); 4-min sessions.

Evidence

No peer-reviewed RCTs as of 2025. Marketing claims rely on general taVNS/cVNS literature, not device-specific trials.

Caveats

Aggressive direct-to-consumer marketing. Not a medical device. Treat as wellness, not therapy.

Consumer / wellness

Neuvana Xen

Neuvana
Consumer / wellness (no medical claim)
Indications
  • Relaxation, stress, sleep — general wellness
Mechanism

Earbuds deliver micro-current synchronized with music, claimed to stimulate auricular vagal branch.

Parameters

Adjustable intensity; sessions of variable length.

Evidence

No published RCTs. Mechanism plausibility relies on auricular VNS research with different hardware/parameters.

Caveats

Wellness device; do not substitute for medical taVNS protocols.

Consumer / wellness

Apollo Neuro

Apollo Neuroscience
Consumer / wellness (no medical claim)
Indications
  • Stress, sleep, focus, HRV
Mechanism

Wrist/ankle vibrotactile patterns — NOT electrical VNS. Often grouped with vagal tools, but it stimulates mechanoreceptors, not the vagus directly.

Evidence

Small studies showing HRV shifts; mechanism is sensory/parasympathetic entrainment, not vagal-nerve stimulation per se.

Caveats

Frequently misclassified as a 'vagus nerve device'. It isn't — be precise with patients.

Consumer / wellness

Sensate

BioSelf Technology
Consumer / wellness (no medical claim)
Indications
  • Stress reduction, sleep, HRV
Mechanism

Chest-placed device delivers low-frequency infrasonic resonance + paired audio. Claimed to engage vagal tone via thoracic resonance.

Evidence

One company-funded RCT (2022) and several small studies; replication limited.

Caveats

Mechanism is non-electrical; calling it 'vagus nerve stimulation' is a stretch.

Investigational / research

Custom research stimulators (Digitimer DS7A/DS8R, STMISOLA, Soterix)

Various
Investigational
Indications
  • Academic taVNS / cVNS research only
Mechanism

Constant-current isolated pulse generators allowing precise parameter control for trials.

Parameters

Fully configurable — used to define dosing windows that consumer devices later approximate.

Evidence

Underpins most published mechanistic taVNS data (HRV, P300, inflammatory markers).

Caveats

Not for clinical or home use. Mentioned so learners can interpret the literature.

Reading this catalog
Regulatory status (FDA-approved, FDA-cleared, CE-marked, consumer wellness) is not a quality ranking — it tells you what claims a manufacturer is legally allowed to make and how rigorously the device was reviewed. A consumer device with the same hardware as a cleared one does not inherit its evidence.